Comparative Effectiveness of Weight-Loss Interventions in Clinical Practice

This trial showed that two types of behavioral interventions, one based on remote, call-center support and the other on in-person support, resulted in significant weight loss among obese patients. These results provide templates for effective weight-loss programs in primary care practices. Obesity i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2011-11, Vol.365 (21), p.1959-1968
Hauptverfasser: Appel, Lawrence J, Clark, Jeanne M, Yeh, Hsin-Chieh, Wang, Nae-Yuh, Coughlin, Janelle W, Daumit, Gail, Miller, Edgar R, Dalcin, Arlene, Jerome, Gerald J, Geller, Steven, Noronha, Gary, Pozefsky, Thomas, Charleston, Jeanne, Reynolds, Jeffrey B, Durkin, Nowella, Rubin, Richard R, Louis, Thomas A, Brancati, Frederick L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This trial showed that two types of behavioral interventions, one based on remote, call-center support and the other on in-person support, resulted in significant weight loss among obese patients. These results provide templates for effective weight-loss programs in primary care practices. Obesity is an important and growing public health problem around the world. In the United States, approximately one third of adults are obese. 1 Obesity adversely affects each of the major cardiovascular risk factors — blood pressure, lipid profile, and diabetes. As a consequence, obese persons have an increased risk of death, especially from cardiovascular disease. 2 , 3 The economic burden of the obesity epidemic is enormous; the estimated direct and indirect costs related to obesity exceed $110 billion annually in the United States. 4 An extensive body of evidence from efficacy trials has shown that weight loss is achievable and that modest . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1108660