Prospective Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Oncolytic Adenovirus-Mediated Cytotoxic Gene Therapy in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

Purpose To assess the safety and efficacy of combining oncolytic adenovirus-mediated cytotoxic gene therapy (OAMCGT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Methods and Materials Forty-four men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomly assig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2014-06, Vol.89 (2), p.268-276
Hauptverfasser: Freytag, Svend O., PhD, Stricker, Hans, MD, Lu, Mei, PhD, Elshaikh, Mohamed, MD, Aref, Ibrahim, MD, Pradhan, Deepak, MD, Levin, Kenneth, MD, Kim, Jae Ho, MD, PhD, Peabody, James, MD, Siddiqui, Farzan, MD, PhD, Barton, Kenneth, PhD, Pegg, Jan, BA, Zhang, Yingshu, MS, Cheng, Jingfang, BS, Oja-Tebbe, Nancy, MS, Bourgeois, Renee, BS, Gupta, Nilesh, MD, Lane, Zhaoli, MD, Rodriguez, Ron, MD, PhD, DeWeese, Theodore, MD, Movsas, Benjamin, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To assess the safety and efficacy of combining oncolytic adenovirus-mediated cytotoxic gene therapy (OAMCGT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Methods and Materials Forty-four men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive either OAMCGT plus IMRT (arm 1; n=21) or IMRT only (arm 2; n=23). The primary phase 2 endpoint was acute (≤90 days) toxicity. Secondary endpoints included quality of life (QOL), prostate biopsy (12-core) positivity at 2 years, freedom from biochemical/clinical failure (FFF), freedom from metastases, and survival. Results Men in arm 1 exhibited a greater incidence of low-grade influenza-like symptoms, transaminitis, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia than men in arm 2. There were no significant differences in gastrointestinal or genitourinary events or QOL between the 2 arms. Two-year prostate biopsies were obtained from 37 men (84%). Thirty-three percent of men in arm 1 were biopsy-positive versus 58% in arm 2, representing a 42% relative reduction in biopsy positivity in the investigational arm ( P =.13). There was a 60% relative reduction in biopsy positivity in the investigational arm in men with
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.034