Determinants of surgical decision making: a national survey

Abstract Background We conducted a national survey of general surgeons to address the association between surgeon characteristics and the tendency to recommend surgery. Methods We used a web-based survey with 25 hypothetical clinical scenarios with clinical equipoise regarding the decision to operat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2013-12, Vol.206 (6), p.970-978
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Niamey P., M.D., M.S.H.P, Wilson, Francis P., M.D., M.S.C.E, Neuman, Mark, M.D., M.S, Epstein, Andrew, Ph.D, Bell, Richard, M.D, Armstrong, Katrina, M.D., M.S.C.E, Murayama, Kenric, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background We conducted a national survey of general surgeons to address the association between surgeon characteristics and the tendency to recommend surgery. Methods We used a web-based survey with 25 hypothetical clinical scenarios with clinical equipoise regarding the decision to operate. The respondent-level tendency to operate (TTO) score was calculated as the average score over the 25 scenarios. Surgical volume was based on self-report. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between TTO, other covariates of interest, and surgical volume. Results There were 907 respondents. The mean surgical TTO was 3.05 ± .43. Surgeons had significantly lower TTO scores when responding to questions within their area of practice ( P < .0001). There was no association between TTO and malpractice concerns, financial incentives, or compensation structure. Conclusions Surgeons recommend intervention far less frequently within their area of specialization. Malpractice concerns, volume, and financial compensation do not significantly affect surgical decision making.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.018