Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Nonadherence with Once-Daily Glaucoma Medications
Objective To develop and validate a predictive model to estimate the probability of being nonadherent to topical glaucoma medications. Design Prospective cohort study. Participants Patients being treated with once-daily prostaglandin eye drops. Methods A predictive model for nonadherence was develop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2013-07, Vol.120 (7), p.1396-1402 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective To develop and validate a predictive model to estimate the probability of being nonadherent to topical glaucoma medications. Design Prospective cohort study. Participants Patients being treated with once-daily prostaglandin eye drops. Methods A predictive model for nonadherence was developed from the Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA) study (n = 196) using stepwise logistic regression. The performance of the TDA-derived model was assessed using a separate cohort of subjects from the Automated Dosing Reminder Study (ADRS; n = 407). The assessment was based on regression coefficients, discrimination, and calibration. We also developed a scoring system from the TDA-derived model to simplify the estimation of risk for clinical use. Main Outcome Measures Usage of drops was monitored electronically for 3 months in both studies. Adherence was calculated as the percentage of days on which a dose was taken within 4 hours of the average dosing time for that patient. Nonadherence was defined as taking ≤75% prescribed doses within a window starting 2 weeks after the baseline visit until 2 weeks before the follow-up visit. Results Six factors, including younger age, black race, worse general health status, shorter duration of glaucoma medication therapy, lower self-reported adherence, and admitting to not following doctors' orders, were associated with being nonadherent and were included in the predictive model. The coefficients for the TDA-derived and the ADRS-derived predictive models were similar. The risk scoring system developed from the TDA study had good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P = 0.102) when applied to the ADRS population. Conclusions The TDA-derived predictive model for nonadherence performed well in an independent population. A risk scoring system was developed using demographic data and patient responses to 4 questions to provide an estimate of the probability of being nonadherent. Financial Disclosure(s) The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.002 |