Effect of Pay-for-Performance Incentives on Quality of Care in Small Practices With Electronic Health Records: A Randomized Trial
IMPORTANCE Most evaluations of pay-for-performance (P4P) incentives have focused on large-group practices. Thus, the effect of P4P in small practices, where many US residents receive care, is largely unknown. Furthermore, whether electronic health records (EHRs) with chronic disease management capab...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2013-09, Vol.310 (10), p.1051-1059 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | IMPORTANCE Most evaluations of pay-for-performance (P4P) incentives have focused on large-group practices. Thus, the effect of P4P in small practices, where many US residents receive care, is largely unknown. Furthermore, whether electronic health records (EHRs) with chronic disease management capabilities support small-practice response to P4P has not been studied. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of P4P incentives on quality in EHR-enabled small practices in the context of an established quality improvement initiative. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cluster-randomized trial of small ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.2013.277353 |