Assessing outcomes of surgical procedures
The World Health Organization defines QOL as a state of complete physical and social well-being not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.1 The question of who should measure QOL - the doctor or the patient - is important. Patient-selected QOL measures usually focus on physical, psychological a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Journal of Surgery 1998-06, Vol.41 (3), p.184-185 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The World Health Organization defines QOL as a state of complete physical and social well-being not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.1 The question of who should measure QOL - the doctor or the patient - is important. Patient-selected QOL measures usually focus on physical, psychological and interpersonal well-being, and QOL scales must be divided into disease-specific, function-- specific and population-specific domains. Health-related QOL studies must reflect these 3-dimensional domains: objective, subjective and health specific. The objective QOL domain encompasses general health and functional status, along with social status, whereas the subjective domain deals with life satisfaction and measures of self esteem. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-428X 1488-2310 |