Modulation of the fecal bile acid profile by gut microbiota in cirrhosis

Background & Aims The 7α-dehydroxylation of primary bile acids (BAs), chenodeoxycholic (CDCA) and cholic acid (CA) into the secondary BAs, lithocholic (LCA) and deoxycholic acid (DCA), is a key function of the gut microbiota. We aimed at studying the linkage between fecal BAs and gut microbiota...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hepatology 2013-05, Vol.58 (5), p.949-955
Hauptverfasser: Kakiyama, Genta, Pandak, William M, Gillevet, Patrick M, Hylemon, Phillip B, Heuman, Douglas M, Daita, Kalyani, Takei, Hajime, Muto, Akina, Nittono, Hiroshi, Ridlon, Jason M, White, Melanie B, Noble, Nicole A, Monteith, Pamela, Fuchs, Michael, Thacker, Leroy R, Sikaroodi, Masoumeh, Bajaj, Jasmohan S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background & Aims The 7α-dehydroxylation of primary bile acids (BAs), chenodeoxycholic (CDCA) and cholic acid (CA) into the secondary BAs, lithocholic (LCA) and deoxycholic acid (DCA), is a key function of the gut microbiota. We aimed at studying the linkage between fecal BAs and gut microbiota in cirrhosis since this could help understand cirrhosis progression. Methods Fecal microbiota were analyzed by culture-independent multitagged-pyrosequencing, fecal BAs using HPLC and serum BAs using LC–MS in controls, early (Child A) and advanced cirrhotics (Child B/C). A subgroup of early cirrhotics underwent BA and microbiota analysis before/after eight weeks of rifaximin. Results Cross-sectional: 47 cirrhotics (24 advanced) and 14 controls were included. In feces, advanced cirrhotics had the lowest total, secondary, secondary/primary BA ratios, and the highest primary BAs compared to early cirrhotics and controls. Secondary fecal BAs were detectable in all controls but in a significantly lower proportion of cirrhotics ( p
ISSN:0168-8278
1600-0641
DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.01.003