In Situ Electrode Calibration Strategy for Voltammetric Measurements In Vivo

Technological advances have allowed background-subtracted fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to emerge as a powerful tool for monitoring molecular fluctuations in living brain tissue; however, there has been little progress to date in advancing electrode calibration procedures. Variability in the performa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2013-12, Vol.85 (23), p.11568-11575
Hauptverfasser: Roberts, James G, Toups, J. Vincent, Eyualem, Eyob, McCarty, Gregory S, Sombers, Leslie A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Technological advances have allowed background-subtracted fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to emerge as a powerful tool for monitoring molecular fluctuations in living brain tissue; however, there has been little progress to date in advancing electrode calibration procedures. Variability in the performance of these handmade electrodes renders calibration necessary for accurate quantification; however, experimental protocol makes standard postcalibration difficult or in some cases impossible. We have developed a model that utilizes information contained in the background charging current to predict electrode sensitivity to dopamine, ascorbic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and pH shifts at any point in an electrochemical experiment. Analysis determined a high correlation between predicted sensitivity and values obtained using the traditional postcalibration method, across all analytes. To validate this approach in vivo, calibration factors obtained with this model at electrodes in brain tissue were compared to values obtained at these electrodes using a traditional ex vivo calibration. Both demonstrated equal power of predictability for dopamine concentrations. This advance enables in situ electrode calibration, allowing researchers to track changes in electrode sensitivity over time and eliminating the need to generalize calibration factors between electrodes or across multiple days in an experiment.
ISSN:0003-2700
1520-6882
1520-6882
DOI:10.1021/ac402884n