Web-Based Symptom Management for Women With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the WRITE Symptoms Intervention

Abstract Context Little research has focused on symptom management among women with ovarian cancer. Written Representational Intervention To Ease Symptoms (WRITE Symptoms) is an educational intervention delivered through asynchronous web-based message boards between a study participant and a nurse....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pain and symptom management 2014-02, Vol.47 (2), p.218-230
Hauptverfasser: Donovan, Heidi S., PhD, RN, Ward, Sandra E., PhD, RN, FAAN, Sereika, Susan M., PhD, Knapp, Judith E., PhD, LCSW, Sherwood, Paula R., PhD, RN, CNRN, FAAN, Bender, Catherine M., PhD, RN, FAAN, Edwards, Robert P., MD, Fields, Margaret, MSN, RN, Ingel, Renee, MSN, RN
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Context Little research has focused on symptom management among women with ovarian cancer. Written Representational Intervention To Ease Symptoms (WRITE Symptoms) is an educational intervention delivered through asynchronous web-based message boards between a study participant and a nurse. Objectives We evaluated WRITE Symptoms for 1) feasibility of conducting the study via message boards, 2) system usability, 3) participant satisfaction, and 4) initial efficacy. Methods Participants were 65 women (mean age, 56.5; SD = 9.23) with recurrent ovarian cancer randomized using minimization with race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white vs. minority) as the stratification factor. Measures were obtained at baseline and two and six weeks after intervention. Outcomes were feasibility of conducting the study, system usability, participant satisfaction, and efficacy (symptom severity, distress, consequences, and controllability). Results Fifty-six (87.5%) participants were retained, and the mean usability score (range 1–7) was 6.18 (SD = 1.29). All satisfaction items were scored at 5 (of 7) or higher. There were significant between-group effects at T2 for symptom distress, with those in the WRITE Symptoms group reporting lower distress than those in the control group [ t (88.4) = −2.57; P  = 0.012], with a similar trend for symptom severity [ t (40.4) = −1.95; P  = 0.058]. Repeated measures analysis also supported a group effect, with those in the WRITE Symptoms group reporting lower symptom distress than those in the control condition [ F (1, 56.7) = 4.59; P  = 0.037]. Conclusion Participants found the intervention and assessment system easy to use and had high levels of satisfaction. Initial efficacy was supported by decreases in symptom severity and distress.
ISSN:0885-3924
1873-6513
DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.04.005