Naturally occurring variation in copia expression is due to both element (cis) and host (trans) regulatory variation

Significant differences in levels of copia [Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon] expression exist among six species representing the Drosophila melanogaster species complex (D. melanogaster, Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila yakuba, and Dr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 1996-07, Vol.93 (14), p.7097-7102
Hauptverfasser: Matyunina, L.V, Jordan, I.K, McDonald, J.F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Significant differences in levels of copia [Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon] expression exist among six species representing the Drosophila melanogaster species complex (D. melanogaster, Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila yakuba, and Drosophila erecta) and a more distantly related species (Drosophila willistoni). These differences in expression are correlated with major size variation mapping to putative regulatory regions of the copia 5' LTR and adjacent untranslated leader region (ULR). Sequence analysis indicates that these size variants were derived from a series of regional duplication events. The ability of the copia LTR-ULR size variants to drive expression of a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene was tested in each of the seven species. The results indicate that both element-encoded (cis) and host-genome-encoded (trans) genetic differences are responsible for the variability in copia expression within and between Drosophila species. This finding indicates that models purporting to explain the dynamics and distribution of retrotransposons in natural populations must consider the potential impact of both element-encoded and host-genome-encoded regulatory variation to be valid. We propose that interelement selection among retrotransposons may provide a molecular drive mechanism for the evolution of eukaryotic enhancers which can be subsequently distributed throughout the genome by retrotransposition.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.93.14.7097