Impact of allele-level HLA matching on outcomes after myeloablative single unit umbilical cord blood transplantation for hematologic malignancy

We studied the effect of allele-level matching at human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 in 1568 single umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantations for hematologic malignancy. The primary end point was nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Only 7% of units were allele matched at HLA-A, -B, -C, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2014-01, Vol.123 (1), p.133-140
Hauptverfasser: Eapen, Mary, Klein, John P., Ruggeri, Annalisa, Spellman, Stephen, Lee, Stephanie J., Anasetti, Claudio, Arcese, William, Barker, Juliet N., Baxter-Lowe, Lee Ann, Brown, Maria, Fernandez-Vina, Marcelo A., Freeman, John, He, Wensheng, Iori, Anna Paola, Horowitz, Mary M., Locatelli, Franco, Marino, Susana, Maiers, Martin, Michel, Gerard, Sanz, Guillermo F., Gluckman, Eliane, Rocha, Vanderson
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We studied the effect of allele-level matching at human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 in 1568 single umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantations for hematologic malignancy. The primary end point was nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Only 7% of units were allele matched at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1; 15% were mismatched at 1, 26% at 2, 30% at 3, 16% at 4, and 5% at 5 alleles. In a subset, allele-level HLA match was assigned using imputation; concordance between HLA-match assignment and outcome correlation was confirmed between the actual and imputed HLA-match groups. Compared with HLA-matched units, neutrophil recovery was lower with mismatches at 3, 4, or 5, but not 1 or 2 alleles. NRM was higher with units mismatched at 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 alleles compared with HLA-matched units. The observed effects are independent of cell dose and patient age. These data support allele-level HLA matching in the selection of single UCB units. Key Points
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2013-05-506253