Accuracy Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: The North American Comparator Trial

Background: This study evaluated differences in accuracy between the CONTOUR® NEXT EZ (EZ) blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) and four other BGMSs [ACCU-CHEK® Aviva (ACAP), FreeStyle Freedom Lite® (FFL), ONE TOUCH® Ultra®2 (OTU2), and TRUEtrack® (TT)]. Methods: Up to three capillary blood sample...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of diabetes science and technology 2013-09, Vol.7 (5), p.1294-1304
Hauptverfasser:	Halldorsdottir, Solveig, Warchal-Windham, Mary Ellen, Wallace, Jane F., Pardo, Scott, Parkes, Joan Lee, Simmons, David A.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Blood Glucose - analysis Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - standards Diabetes Mellitus - blood Female Humans Male Middle Aged Original United States Young Adult
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Background: This study evaluated differences in accuracy between the CONTOUR® NEXT EZ (EZ) blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) and four other BGMSs [ACCU-CHEK® Aviva (ACAP), FreeStyle Freedom Lite® (FFL), ONE TOUCH® Ultra®2 (OTU2), and TRUEtrack® (TT)]. Methods: Up to three capillary blood samples (N = 393) were collected from 146 subjects with and without diabetes. One sample per subject was tested with fresh (natural) blood; the other samples were glycolyzed to lower blood glucose to
ISSN:	1932-2968 1932-2968 1932-3107
DOI:	10.1177/193229681300700520