Scope of Global Health Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs

OBJECTIVE:To enumerate global health training activities in U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs and to examine the worldwide distribution of programmatic activity relative to the maternal and perinatal disease burden. METHODS:Using a systematic, web-based protocol, we searched for glob...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2013-11, Vol.122 (5), p.1101-1109
Hauptverfasser: Hung, Kristin J., Tsai, Alexander C., Johnson, Timothy R.B., Walensky, Rochelle P., Bangsberg, David R., Kerry, Vanessa B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:To enumerate global health training activities in U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs and to examine the worldwide distribution of programmatic activity relative to the maternal and perinatal disease burden. METHODS:Using a systematic, web-based protocol, we searched for global health training opportunities at all U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Country-level data on disability-adjusted life-years resulting from maternal and perinatal conditions were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease study. We calculated Spearmanʼs rank correlation coefficients to estimate the cross-country association between programmatic activity and disease burden. RESULTS:Of the 243 accredited U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs, we identified 41 (17%) with one of several possible predefined categories of programmatic activity. Thirty-three residency programs offered their residents opportunities to participate in one or more elective-based rotations, eight offered extended field-based training, and 18 offered research activities. A total of 128 programmatic activities were dispersed across 64 different countries. At the country level, the number of programmatic activities had a statistically significant association with the total disease burden resulting from maternal (Spearmanʼs ρ=0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.57) and perinatal conditions (ρ=0.34, 95% CI 0.10–0.54) but not gynecologic cancers (ρ=−0.24, 95% CI −0.46 to 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:There are few global health training opportunities for U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residents. These activities are disproportionately distributed among countries with greater burdens of disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:II
ISSN:0029-7844
1873-233X
DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a9c1c8