Calcium inhibits promotion by hot dog of 1,2‐dimethylhydrazine‐induced mucin‐depleted foci in rat colon

Epidemiology suggests that processed meat is associated with colorectal cancer risk, but few experimental studies support this association. We have shown that a model of cured meat made in a pilot workshop promotes preneoplastic lesions, mucin‐depleted foci (MDF) in the colon of rats. This study had...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2013-12, Vol.133 (11), p.2533-2541
Hauptverfasser: Santarelli, Raphaelle L., Naud, Nathalie, Taché, Sylviane, Guéraud, Françoise, Vendeuvre, Jean‐Luc, Zhou, Lin, Anwar, Muhammad M., Mirvish, Sidney S., Corpet, Denis E., Pierre, Fabrice H.F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Epidemiology suggests that processed meat is associated with colorectal cancer risk, but few experimental studies support this association. We have shown that a model of cured meat made in a pilot workshop promotes preneoplastic lesions, mucin‐depleted foci (MDF) in the colon of rats. This study had two aims: to check if real store‐bought processed meats also promote MDF, and to test if calcium carbonate, which suppresses heme‐induced promotion, can suppress promotion by processed meat. A 14‐day study was done to test the effect of nine purchased cured meats on fecal and urinary biomarkers associated with heme‐induced carcinogenesis promotion. Fecal water from rats given hot dog or fermented raw dry sausage was particularly cytotoxic. These two cured meats were thus given to rats pretreated with 1,2‐dimethylhydrazine, to evaluate their effect on colorectal carcinogenesis. After a 100‐days feeding period, fecal apparent total N‐nitroso compounds (ATNC) were assayed and colons were scored for MDF. Hot dog diet increased fecal ATNC and the number of MDF per colon compared with the no‐meat control diet (3.0 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 1.4, p 
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/ijc.28286