Neonatal early-onset sepsis evaluations among well-appearing infants: projected impact of changes in CDC GBS guidelines
Objective: To determine (a) the proportion of asymptomatic infants born at ⩾35 weeks gestation evaluated for early-onset sepsis (EOS) and exposed to postnatal antibiotics; (b) reasons for and outcomes of the evaluations, and (c) anticipated changes when applying the Centers for Disease Control and P...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of perinatology 2013-03, Vol.33 (3), p.198-205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective:
To determine (a) the proportion of asymptomatic infants born at ⩾35 weeks gestation evaluated for early-onset sepsis (EOS) and exposed to postnatal antibiotics; (b) reasons for and outcomes of the evaluations, and (c) anticipated changes when applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2010 guidelines to this study population.
Study Design:
Retrospective cohort study of infants born at ⩾35 weeks gestation in 2008–2009 in a large maternity center.
Result:
Out of the 7226 infants that met the study criteria: 1062 (14.7%) were evaluated for EOS and half of those evaluated, received empiric antibiotics. 70.4% of evaluations were performed owing to maternal intrapartum fever, but 23% were prompted by inadequate Group B
Streptococcus
(GBS) prophylaxis alone. Three cases of blood culture-proven infection were identified.
Conclusion:
Improved approaches are needed to identify asymptomatic infants who are at risk for EOS to decrease unnecessary evaluations and antibiotic exposure. Transition to the 2010 CDC GBS guidelines may eliminate a quarter of EOS evaluations among these infants. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0743-8346 1476-5543 |
DOI: | 10.1038/jp.2012.96 |