Neonatal early-onset sepsis evaluations among well-appearing infants: projected impact of changes in CDC GBS guidelines

Objective: To determine (a) the proportion of asymptomatic infants born at ⩾35 weeks gestation evaluated for early-onset sepsis (EOS) and exposed to postnatal antibiotics; (b) reasons for and outcomes of the evaluations, and (c) anticipated changes when applying the Centers for Disease Control and P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of perinatology 2013-03, Vol.33 (3), p.198-205
Hauptverfasser: Mukhopadhyay, S, Eichenwald, E C, Puopolo, K M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To determine (a) the proportion of asymptomatic infants born at ⩾35 weeks gestation evaluated for early-onset sepsis (EOS) and exposed to postnatal antibiotics; (b) reasons for and outcomes of the evaluations, and (c) anticipated changes when applying the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2010 guidelines to this study population. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of infants born at ⩾35 weeks gestation in 2008–2009 in a large maternity center. Result: Out of the 7226 infants that met the study criteria: 1062 (14.7%) were evaluated for EOS and half of those evaluated, received empiric antibiotics. 70.4% of evaluations were performed owing to maternal intrapartum fever, but 23% were prompted by inadequate Group B Streptococcus (GBS) prophylaxis alone. Three cases of blood culture-proven infection were identified. Conclusion: Improved approaches are needed to identify asymptomatic infants who are at risk for EOS to decrease unnecessary evaluations and antibiotic exposure. Transition to the 2010 CDC GBS guidelines may eliminate a quarter of EOS evaluations among these infants.
ISSN:0743-8346
1476-5543
DOI:10.1038/jp.2012.96