Test anxiety and performance-avoidance goals explain gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT scores

► Test anxiety accounts for gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT scores. ► Performance-avoidance goals accounts for gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT scores. ► When both test anxiety and performance goals are considered simultaneously, the gender differences become t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality and individual differences 2012-11, Vol.53 (7), p.816-820
1. Verfasser: Hannon, Brenda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Test anxiety accounts for gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT scores. ► Performance-avoidance goals accounts for gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT scores. ► When both test anxiety and performance goals are considered simultaneously, the gender differences become trivial. This study uses analysis of co-variance in order to determine which cognitive/learning (working memory, knowledge integration, epistemic belief of learning) or social/personality factors (test anxiety, performance-avoidance goals) might account for gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT scores. The results revealed that none of the cognitive/learning factors accounted for gender differences in SAT performance. However, the social/personality factors of test anxiety and performance-avoidance goals each separately accounted for all of the significant gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT performance. Furthermore, when the influences of both of these factors were statistically removed simultaneously, all non-significant gender differences reduced further to become trivial by Cohen’s (1988) standards. Taken as a whole, these results suggest that gender differences in SAT-V, SAT-M, and overall SAT performance are a consequence of social/learning factors.
ISSN:0191-8869
1873-3549
DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.003