Influencing surgical management in patients with carcinoma of the cervix using a T2- and ZOOM-diffusion-weighted endovaginal MRI technique
Background: Endovaginal MRI (evMRI) at 3.0-T with T2-weighted (T2-W) and ZOnal Oblique Multislice (ZOOM)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) potentially improves the detection of stage Ia/Ib1 cervical cancer. We aimed to determine its sensitivity/specificity, document tumour-to-stromal contrast and est...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of cancer 2013-08, Vol.109 (3), p.615-622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Endovaginal MRI (evMRI) at 3.0-T with T2-weighted (T2-W) and ZOnal Oblique Multislice (ZOOM)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) potentially improves the detection of stage Ia/Ib1 cervical cancer. We aimed to determine its sensitivity/specificity, document tumour-to-stromal contrast and establish the effect of imaging on surgical management.
Methods:
Following ethical approval and written informed consent, 57 consecutive patients with suspected stage Ia/Ib1 cervical cancer underwent evMRI at 3.0-T using T2-W and ZOOM-DWI. Sensitivity/specificity were calculated against histopathology for two independent observers. Tumour-to-stromal contrast was determined on T2-W, and diffusion-weighted (b=800 s mm
−2
) images and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were recorded. In patients due for radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT), change of surgical management based on imaging findings was documented.
Results:
Sensitivity/specificity for detecting tumour was the following: reporting read 88.0/81.8%, anonymised read 92.0/81.8% (observer 1); 84.0/72.7% (observer2; median tumour volume=1.7 cm
3
). Intraobserver agreement was excellent (kappa=0.89) and the interobserver agreement was good (kappa=0.65). Tumour-to-stromal contrast was greater on ZOOM-DWI compared with T2-W images (3.35±2.36
vs
1.39±0.95;
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.2013.375 |