Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft

Purpose Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency contributes to symptomatic functional instability of the knee, regardless of age. We evaluated patient-reported clinical outcome, instrumental stability and prevalence of radiological osteoarthritis based on two homogenous patient samples aged 50 y...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International orthopaedics 2013-05, Vol.37 (5), p.809-817
Hauptverfasser: Struewer, Johannes, Ziring, Ewgeni, Oberkircher, Ludwig, Schüttler, Karl F., Efe, Turgay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency contributes to symptomatic functional instability of the knee, regardless of age. We evaluated patient-reported clinical outcome, instrumental stability and prevalence of radiological osteoarthritis based on two homogenous patient samples aged 50 years, an average of three years after isolated ACL reconstruction. Methods ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft was done in 19 patients and a four-stranded semitendinosus tendon (ST) autograft in 22 patients. Clinical and functional follow-up assessment was performed an average of 32 months after surgical treatment. Clinical and functional follow-up assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner score and Lysholm score. Instrumental stability testing was carried out using the KT–1000™ arthrometer. The degree of degenerative changes and prevalence of osteoarthritis was based on the Kellgren–Lawrence classification. Results Mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 28–36). Mean age was 49.4 years in both groups. The median pre-injury Tegner score was 5.5 (range, 2–8) and the median preoperative Lysholm score was 35 (range, 15–69). At two years, all variables improved significantly for both groups compared to the preoperative values ( P  
ISSN:0341-2695
1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-013-1807-7