Quantitative analysis of hyperpolarized 129Xe ventilation imaging in healthy volunteers and subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

In this study, hyperpolarized 129Xe MR ventilation and 1H anatomical images were obtained from three subject groups: young healthy volunteers (HVs), subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and age‐matched controls (AMCs). Ventilation images were quantified by two methods: an exper...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NMR in biomedicine 2013-04, Vol.26 (4), p.424-435
Hauptverfasser: Virgincar, Rohan S., Cleveland, Zackary I., Sivaram Kaushik, S., Freeman, Matthew S., Nouls, John, Cofer, Gary P., Martinez-Jimenez, Santiago, He, Mu, Kraft, Monica, Wolber, Jan, Page McAdams, H., Driehuys, Bastiaan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, hyperpolarized 129Xe MR ventilation and 1H anatomical images were obtained from three subject groups: young healthy volunteers (HVs), subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and age‐matched controls (AMCs). Ventilation images were quantified by two methods: an expert reader‐based ventilation defect score percentage (VDS%) and a semi‐automated segmentation‐based ventilation defect percentage (VDP). Reader‐based values were assigned by two experienced radiologists and resolved by consensus. In the semi‐automated analysis, 1H anatomical images and 129Xe ventilation images were both segmented following registration to obtain the thoracic cavity volume and ventilated volume, respectively, which were then expressed as a ratio to obtain the VDP. Ventilation images were also characterized by generating signal intensity histograms from voxels within the thoracic cavity volume, and heterogeneity was analyzed using the coefficient of variation (CV). The reader‐based VDS% correlated strongly with the semi‐automatically generated VDP (r = 0.97, p 
ISSN:0952-3480
1099-1492
DOI:10.1002/nbm.2880