Endoscopic carpal tunnel release and nerve conduction studies
We investigated the outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison with the results of preoperative nerve conduction studies. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) and the second lumbr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2001, Vol.24 (6), p.361-363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We investigated the outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in comparison with the results of preoperative nerve conduction studies. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) and the second lumbrical muscle (L2) was recorded following median nerve stimulation at the wrist. A total of 38 hands in 35 patients were classified into four categories. Hands with a similarly prolonged distal motor latency for the APB and L2 were classified as type I (n=25), while those with a more prolonged distal motor latency for the APB than for the L2 (>0.7 ms) were classified as type 2 (n=10). Hands with a CMAP for the APB, but not L2, were classified as type 3 (n=1), and hands with no CMAP for either the APB or L2 were classified as type 4 (n=2). After ECTR, all of the type 1 and 2 hands were improved. Patients with type 3 and type 4 hands did not show satisfactory improvement, which may have been due to anatomical variation of the recurrent motor branch of the median nerve. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s002640000189 |