Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial

Background There are presently no available therapeutic options for patients with peanut allergy. Objective We sought to investigate the safety, efficacy, and immunologic effects of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Methods After a baseline oral food challenge (OFC) of up to 2 g of peanut powd...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2013-01, Vol.131 (1), p.119-127.e7
Hauptverfasser: Fleischer, David M., MD, Burks, A. Wesley, MD, Vickery, Brian P., MD, Scurlock, Amy M., MD, Wood, Robert A., MD, Jones, Stacie M., MD, Sicherer, Scott H., MD, Liu, Andrew H., MD, Stablein, Donald, PhD, Henning, Alice K., MS, Mayer, Lloyd, MD, Lindblad, Robert, MD, Plaut, Marshall, MD, Sampson, Hugh A., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There are presently no available therapeutic options for patients with peanut allergy. Objective We sought to investigate the safety, efficacy, and immunologic effects of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Methods After a baseline oral food challenge (OFC) of up to 2 g of peanut powder (approximately 50% protein; median successfully consumed dose [SCD], 46 mg), 40 subjects, aged 12 to 37 years (median, 15 years), were randomized 1:1 across 5 sites to daily peanut or placebo SLIT. A 5-g OFC was performed after 44 weeks, followed by unblinding; placebo-treated subjects then crossed over to higher dose peanut SLIT, followed by a subsequent crossover Week 44 5-g OFC. Week 44 OFCs from both groups were compared with baseline OFCs; subjects successfully consuming 5 g or at least 10-fold more peanut powder than the baseline OFC threshold were considered responders. Results After 44 weeks of SLIT, 14 (70%) of 20 subjects receiving peanut SLIT were responders compared with 3 (15%) of 20 subjects receiving placebo ( P  
ISSN:0091-6749
1097-6825
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.11.011