Variation in Patient-Sharing Networks of Physicians Across the United States

CONTEXT Physicians are embedded in informal networks that result from their sharing of patients, information, and behaviors. OBJECTIVES To identify professional networks among physicians, examine how such networks vary across geographic regions, and determine factors associated with physician connec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2012-07, Vol.308 (3), p.265-273
Hauptverfasser: Landon, Bruce E, Keating, Nancy L, Barnett, Michael L, Onnela, Jukka-Pekka, Paul, Sudeshna, O’Malley, A. James, Keegan, Thomas, Christakis, Nicholas A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:CONTEXT Physicians are embedded in informal networks that result from their sharing of patients, information, and behaviors. OBJECTIVES To identify professional networks among physicians, examine how such networks vary across geographic regions, and determine factors associated with physician connections. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Using methods adopted from social network analysis, Medicare administrative data from 2006 were used to study 4 586 044 Medicare beneficiaries seen by 68 288 physicians practicing in 51 hospital referral regions (HRRs). Distinct networks depicting connections between physicians (defined based on shared patients) were constructed for each of the 51 HRRs. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Variation in network characteristics across HRRs and factors associated with physicians being connected. RESULTS The number of physicians per HRR ranged from 135 in Minot, North Dakota, to 8197 in Boston, Massachusetts. There was substantial variation in network characteristics across HRRs. For example, the mean (SD) adjusted degree (number of other physicians each physician was connected to per 100 Medicare beneficiaries) across all HRRs was 27.3 (range, 11.7-54.4); also, primary care physician relative centrality (how central primary care physicians were in the network relative to other physicians) ranged from 0.19 to 1.06, suggesting that primary care physicians were more than 5 times more central in some markets than in others. Physicians with ties to each other were far more likely to be based at the same hospital (69.2% of unconnected physician pairs vs 96.0% of connected physician pairs; adjusted rate ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.12-0.12]; P 
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.2012.7615