Accuracy of chemically created periapical lesion measurements using limited cone beam computed tomography
The aim was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements of chemically created periapical lesions using limited cone beam CT. Periapical lesions were chemically created in 18 mandibular cadaver teeth. Mandibles were dissected buccolingually using a bone-cutting burr. Diameters and dept...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology 2010-02, Vol.39 (2), p.95-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim was to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements of chemically created periapical lesions using limited cone beam CT.
Periapical lesions were chemically created in 18 mandibular cadaver teeth. Mandibles were dissected buccolingually using a bone-cutting burr. Diameters and depths were measured directly in the cross-sectional slices using a precision digital caliper. The cross-sectional slices were then embedded in wax, and cone beam CT images were acquired using a NewTom 3G Plus scanner with both 6 inch and 9 inch fields of view (FOVs). Two oral radiologists measured the diameter and depth of periapical lesions on the cross-sectional images using the built-in measurement tools. Measurements were repeated after a 1 week interval. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated by ANOVA. Regression analysis was used to test the correlation between the cone beam CT and digital caliper measurements.
No significant differences were found in diameter or depth measurements between or within observers or between 6 inch and 9 inch FOV images. Regression analysis of diameter and depth measurements made by direct caliper versus 6 inch or 9 inch FOV images revealed a high regression coefficient (for diameter: 6 inch FOV, R(2) = 94.6%; 9 inch FOV, R(2) = 94.8%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0250-832X 1476-542X |
DOI: | 10.1259/dmfr/85088069 |