Comparison of surgical plume among laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors using a real-time digital quantitative technology
Background This study aimed to analyze the effect of surgical plume generation from various ultrasonic dissectors on laparoscopic visibility, including the first cordless ultrasonic dissector, using a novel real-time digital quantification technique. Methods The Covidien Cordless Sonicision, the Har...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.3408-3412 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
This study aimed to analyze the effect of surgical plume generation from various ultrasonic dissectors on laparoscopic visibility, including the first cordless ultrasonic dissector, using a novel real-time digital quantification technique.
Methods
The Covidien Cordless Sonicision, the Harmonic ACE, and the Olympus SonoSurg were applied to bovine liver with industry-specified settings. Consecutive activations were digitally captured from a laparoscope positioned to replicate the clinical setting. Plume was recognized by ImageJ software, and the percentage of pixels containing plume in each video frame was calculated. Analysis of variance statistical multi-analysis and Welch’s
t
test were computed for all
p
values.
Results
The average maximum plume produced by the Sonicision, ACE, and SonoSurg with the maximum setting were respectively 8.76 % (range, 4.32–17.41 %), 18.04 % (range, 9.07–55.12 %), and 9.46 % (range, 5.68–22.12 %) (
p
= 0.026). The deviations between the ACE and the other devices were significant (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-012-2351-z |