Comparison of surgical plume among laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors using a real-time digital quantitative technology

Background This study aimed to analyze the effect of surgical plume generation from various ultrasonic dissectors on laparoscopic visibility, including the first cordless ultrasonic dissector, using a novel real-time digital quantification technique. Methods The Covidien Cordless Sonicision, the Har...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2012-12, Vol.26 (12), p.3408-3412
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Fernando J., Sehrt, David, Pompeo, Alexandre, Molina, Wilson R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background This study aimed to analyze the effect of surgical plume generation from various ultrasonic dissectors on laparoscopic visibility, including the first cordless ultrasonic dissector, using a novel real-time digital quantification technique. Methods The Covidien Cordless Sonicision, the Harmonic ACE, and the Olympus SonoSurg were applied to bovine liver with industry-specified settings. Consecutive activations were digitally captured from a laparoscope positioned to replicate the clinical setting. Plume was recognized by ImageJ software, and the percentage of pixels containing plume in each video frame was calculated. Analysis of variance statistical multi-analysis and Welch’s t test were computed for all p values. Results The average maximum plume produced by the Sonicision, ACE, and SonoSurg with the maximum setting were respectively 8.76 % (range, 4.32–17.41 %), 18.04 % (range, 9.07–55.12 %), and 9.46 % (range, 5.68–22.12 %) ( p  = 0.026). The deviations between the ACE and the other devices were significant ( p  
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-012-2351-z