Long fusions to the sacrum in elderly patients with spinal deformity

Purpose Long spinal deformity fusions in elderly patients continue to be controversial. However, there is a growing population of elderly patients with spinal deformities that may be optimally treated by reconstructive surgery requiring a long fusion to the sacrum. This study evaluated clinical outc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2012-11, Vol.21 (11), p.2165-2169
Hauptverfasser: Crawford, Charles H., Carreon, Leah Y., Bridwell, Keith H., Glassman, Steven D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Long spinal deformity fusions in elderly patients continue to be controversial. However, there is a growing population of elderly patients with spinal deformities that may be optimally treated by reconstructive surgery requiring a long fusion to the sacrum. This study evaluated clinical outcomes in elderly (>65) adult deformity patients who underwent posterior instrumented reconstruction consisting of fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum with iliac fixation. Methods Patients in a prospective database for adult spinal deformity who had a posterior reconstruction with an instrumented fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum that included iliac fixation with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Two cohorts were compared: patients 65 years and older and patients 55 years and younger. Student’s t test for independent groups was used to determine any significant differences between continuous variables. Chi-square was used to compare categorical demographic variables between the two groups. Results The 65 and older group consisted of 15 patients with an average age of 71 years (range 65–78 years). The 55 and younger group consisted of 25 patients with an average age of 45 years (range 30–55 years). The older group had a worse mean co-morbidity score (4.6 vs. 2.1). Baseline SRS scores were similar between groups. Baseline SF-12 data showed worse PCS (22.1 vs. 32.0, p  = 0.009) yet better MCS (63.6 vs. 48.4, p  
ISSN:0940-6719
1432-0932
DOI:10.1007/s00586-012-2310-3