Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection in Melanoma: Different Prognosis for Different Macrometastasis Sites?

Background The prognostic significance of primary tumor location, especially the poor prognosis for melanomas in the scalp and neck region, is well established. However, the prognosis for different sites of nodal macrometastasis has never been studied. This study investigated the prognostic value of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2012-11, Vol.19 (12), p.3913-3918
Hauptverfasser: Wevers, K. P., Bastiaannet, E., Poos, H. P. A. M., van Ginkel, R. J., Plukker, J. T., Hoekstra, H. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The prognostic significance of primary tumor location, especially the poor prognosis for melanomas in the scalp and neck region, is well established. However, the prognosis for different sites of nodal macrometastasis has never been studied. This study investigated the prognostic value of the location of macrometastasis in terms of recurrence and survival rates after therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND). Methods All consecutive FDG-PET-staged melanoma patients with palpable and cytologically proven lymph node metastases operated at our clinic between 2003 and 2011 were included. Disease-free survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared for nodal metastases in the groin, axilla, and neck regions by multivariable analysis. Results A total of 149 patients underwent TLND; there were 70 groin (47 %), 57 axillary (38 %), and 22 neck (15 %) dissections. During a median follow-up of 18 (range 1–98) months, 102 patients (68 %) developed recurrent disease. Distant recurrence was the first sign of progressive disease in 78, 76, and 55 % of the groin, axilla, and neck groups, respectively ( p  = 0.26). Low involved/total lymph nodes (L/N) ratio ( p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-012-2401-8