A Midurethral Sling to Reduce Incontinence after Vaginal Prolapse Repair
Women undergoing surgery for vaginal prolapse are at risk for urinary incontinence. In this randomized trial, women who received a midurethral sling had lower rates of incontinence at 3 and 12 months but higher rates of adverse events than those who received sham incisions. One in five women will un...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2012-06, Vol.366 (25), p.2358-2367 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Women undergoing surgery for vaginal prolapse are at risk for urinary incontinence. In this randomized trial, women who received a midurethral sling had lower rates of incontinence at 3 and 12 months but higher rates of adverse events than those who received sham incisions.
One in five women will undergo surgery for pelvic-organ prolapse in her lifetime,
1
and urinary incontinence commonly occurs with pelvic-organ prolapse. In previously continent women with pelvic-organ prolapse, urinary incontinence develops in approximately a quarter of them after prolapse repair; this phenomenon is referred to as occult, latent, de novo, iatrogenic, or potential stress urinary incontinence.
2
In 2006, the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) trial
2
showed that adding a bladder-neck suspension at the time of abdominal prolapse surgery in women without preoperative stress incontinence significantly reduced the risk of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (23.8%, vs. 44.1% in the control . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1111967 |