Conducting an efficient proactive risk assessment prior to CPOE implementation in an intensive care unit

Abstract Purpose To develop, conduct, and evaluate a proactive risk assessment (PRA) of the design and implementation of CPOE in an ICU. Methods We developed a PRA method based on issues identified from documented experience with conventional PRA methods and the constraints of an organization about...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2013-01, Vol.82 (1), p.25-38
Hauptverfasser: Hundt, Ann Schoofs, Adams, Jean A, Schmid, J. Andrew, Musser, Linda M, Walker, James M, Wetterneck, Tosha B, Douglas, Stephen V, Paris, Bonnie L, Carayon, Pascale
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose To develop, conduct, and evaluate a proactive risk assessment (PRA) of the design and implementation of CPOE in an ICU. Methods We developed a PRA method based on issues identified from documented experience with conventional PRA methods and the constraints of an organization about to implement CPOE in an intensive care unit. The PRA method consists of three phases: planning (three months), team (one five-hour meeting), and evaluation (short- and long-term). Results Sixteen unique relevant vulnerabilities were identified as a result of the PRA team's efforts. Negative consequences resulting from the vulnerabilities included potential patient safety and quality of care issues, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, increases in cognitive burden on CPOE users, and/or worker inconvenience or distress. Actions taken to address the vulnerabilities included redesign of the technology, process (workflow) redesign, user training, and/or ongoing monitoring. Verbal and written evaluation by the team members indicated that the PRA method was useful and that participants were willing to participate in future PRAs. Long-term evaluation was accomplished by monitoring an ongoing “issues list” of CPOE problems identified by or reported to IT staff. Vulnerabilities identified by the team were either resolved prior to CPOE implementation ( n = 7) or shortly thereafter ( n = 9). No other issues were identified beside those identified by the team. Conclusions Generally positive results from the various evaluations including a long-term evaluation demonstrate the value of developing an efficient PRA method that meets organizational and contextual requirements and constraints.
ISSN:1386-5056
1872-8243
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.04.005