Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer
Over 700 men were assigned to radical prostatectomy or observation after receiving a diagnosis of prostate cancer, usually on the basis of elevated PSA levels. After a median of 10 years, between-group differences in all-cause and prostate-cancer mortality were not significant. The treatment of earl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2012-07, Vol.367 (3), p.203-213 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Over 700 men were assigned to radical prostatectomy or observation after receiving a diagnosis of prostate cancer, usually on the basis of elevated PSA levels. After a median of 10 years, between-group differences in all-cause and prostate-cancer mortality were not significant.
The treatment of early-stage prostate cancer remains controversial, especially for tumors detected by means of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.
1
Systematic reviews have provided inadequate information for assessing the comparative effectiveness of treatments and any associated harms.
2
Although the lifetime risk of receiving a diagnosis of prostate cancer is about 17%, the risk of dying from the disease is approximately 3%, suggesting that conservative management may be appropriate for many men.
3
,
4
Two randomized trials compared radical prostatectomy with observation but were conducted before PSA testing became widespread.
5
,
6
One study failed to show a significant difference in overall mortality after . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162 |