Comparison of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Models and Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque as Detected by Computed Tomography for Prediction of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Acute Chest Pain

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:934–942 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Objectives:  The objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2012-08, Vol.19 (8), p.934-942
Hauptverfasser: Ferencik, Maros, Schlett, Christopher L., Bamberg, Fabian, Truong, Quynh A., Nichols, John H., Pena, Antonio J., Shapiro, Michael D., Rogers, Ian S., Seneviratne, Sujith, Parry, Blair Alden, Cury, Ricardo C., Brady, Thomas J., Brown, David F., Nagurney, John T., Hoffmann, Udo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:934–942 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Objectives:  The objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with acute chest pain. The hypothesis was that the combination of risk scores and plaque burden improved the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. Methods:  The study was a subanalysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer‐Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial—a prospective observational cohort study. The authors enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of acute chest pain, inconclusive initial evaluation (negative biomarkers, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram [ECG]), and no history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients underwent contrast‐enhanced 64‐multidetector‐row cardiac CT and received standard clinical care (serial ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and subsequent diagnostic testing, such as exercise treadmill testing, nuclear stress perfusion imaging, and/or invasive coronary angiography), as deemed clinically appropriate. The clinical providers were blinded to CT results. The chest pain score was calculated and the results were dichotomized to ≥10 (high‐risk) and
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01417.x