Optimal dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for unilateral spinal anesthesia during diagnostic knee arthroscopy

To determine the dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% required for unilateral spinal anesthesia during diagnostic knee arthroscopy. This prospective, randomized, clinical study was performed in 80 patients who were assigned to four groups to receive different doses of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Local and regional anesthesia 2010-01, Vol.3, p.85-91
Hauptverfasser: Atef, Hm, El-Kasaby, Am, Omera, Ma, Badr, Md
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% required for unilateral spinal anesthesia during diagnostic knee arthroscopy. This prospective, randomized, clinical study was performed in 80 patients who were assigned to four groups to receive different doses of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg and 12.5 mg in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively). Onset of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic changes, regression of motor block, and incidence of complications were recorded. Unilateral sensory block was reported in 90% and 85% of patients in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively, but not in any patient in Group 3 and Group 4. Unilateral motor block (modified Bromage scale 0) was reported in 95% of patients in Group 1, 90% in Group 2, and only 5% in Group 3, while no patient in Group 4 showed unilateral motor block. The time required for regression of motor block (Bromage scale 0) was prolonged with higher doses. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and urine retention was similar in the study groups. Unilateral sensory and motor block can be achieved with doses of 5 mg and 7.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with a stable hemodynamic state. However, 7.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% was the dose required for adequate unilateral spinal anesthesia.
ISSN:1178-7112
1178-7112
DOI:10.2147/LRA.S11815