Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: Complications and inflammatory response

AIM: To compare natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vs standard laparoscopic ovari- ectomy in mini pigs with respect to technical aspects, complications and parameters of systemic inflammatory response. METHODS: This was a randomized, experimental,survival study. Ten female mini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG 2012-07, Vol.18 (27), p.3558-3564
Hauptverfasser: Martínek, Jan, Ryska, Ondřej, Filípková, Tereza, Doležel, Radek, Juhas, Stefan, Motlík, Jan, Holubová, Monika, Nosek, Vladimír, Rotnáglová, Barbora, Zavoral, Miroslav, Ryska, Miroslav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AIM: To compare natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vs standard laparoscopic ovari- ectomy in mini pigs with respect to technical aspects, complications and parameters of systemic inflammatory response. METHODS: This was a randomized, experimental,survival study. Ten female mini pigs underwent NOTES transgastric ovariectomy (NOTES group) and ten fe- male mini pigs underwent laparoscopic ovariectomy (LAP group). A "percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" approach with guidewire and sphincterotome was used for gastrotomy creation. The ovary was resected us- ing standard biopsy forceps and a snare. The access site was closed using a "KING" closure with a single endoloop and several clips. In the laparoscopic group, a three-port laparoscopy and an ovariectomy were performed with the use of standard laparoscopic de- vices. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count and interleukin (IL)-6 plasma levels were used as indicators of systemic inflammatory response. All animals were euthanized 28 d after surgery. RESULTS: All animals survived without complications. The mean procedure time was 41.3 min + 17.6 min (NOTES group) and 25.7 min + 5.25 min (LAP group, P 〈 0.02). Postmortem examinations demonstrated that 50% and 70% of animals were free of any complica- tions in the NOTES and LAP groups, respectively. The remaining animals developed minor complications (ad- hesions) in a comparable frequency between the two groups. In the NOTES group, one animal developed a small intramural gastric abscess close to the gastrotomy site. A minor serous exudate that was present in 50% and 40% of the animals in the NOTES and laparoscopy groups, respectively, was not considered a complica- tion. In both groups CRP levels increased significantly on the 2nd and 7th postoperative days (POD) and re- turned to normal after 28 d. On POD 2, an increase of CRP level was significantly higher in the NOTES group compared to the LAP group. Values of IL-6 did not dif- fer from baseline values in either of the groups post- operatively. Interestingly, the platelet count decreased significantly on POD 2, but returned close to baseline values on POD 7 and PODs 28-30.CONCLUSION: Both NOTES and laparoscopic ovariec-tomies had a similar frequency of minor complications. However, the NOTES technique produced an increased systemic inflammatory response on POD 2.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3558