The effect of the introduction of the ERAS protocol in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

Objective The aim of the study was to determine whether the introduction of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer offers additional advantages concerning postoperative hospital stay compared to laparoscopy and convention...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of colorectal disease 2012-06, Vol.27 (6), p.751-757
Hauptverfasser: Huibers, C. J. A., de Roos, M. A. J., Ong, K. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The aim of the study was to determine whether the introduction of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer offers additional advantages concerning postoperative hospital stay compared to laparoscopy and conventional care. Methods A consecutive series of patients that underwent a laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer in a single institution between January 2004 and July 2009 were retrospectively included in this study. The ERAS protocol was introduced in this cohort in January 2007. The study cohort was divided in a conventional care group and an ERAS group. Both groups were compared for primary and secondary outcome measures. The primary outcome measure was postoperative length of hospital stay. Results Seventy-six patients were included: 43 in the ERAS group and 33 in the conventional care (control) group. Median hospital stay was 7 days (range 2–83 days) in the ERAS group and 10 days (range 4–74 days) in the control group ( p  = 0.04). Return of bowel function occurred on days 2 and 3 respectively ( p  
ISSN:0179-1958
1432-1262
DOI:10.1007/s00384-011-1385-3