Is preview benefit from word n + 2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements

Although most studies of reading English (and other alphabetic languages) have indicated that readers do not obtain preview benefit from word n + 2, Yang, Wang, Xu, and Rayner ( 2009 ) reported evidence that Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2. However, this effect may not be comm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reading & writing 2012-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1079-1091
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Jinmian, Rayner, Keith, Li, Nan, Wang, Suiping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although most studies of reading English (and other alphabetic languages) have indicated that readers do not obtain preview benefit from word n + 2, Yang, Wang, Xu, and Rayner ( 2009 ) reported evidence that Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2. However, this effect may not be common in Chinese because the character prior to the target word in Yang et al.’s experiment was always a very high frequency function word. In the current experiment, we utilized a relatively low frequency word n + 1 to examine whether an n + 2 preview benefit effect would still exist and failed to find any preview benefit from word n + 2. These results are consistent with a recent study which indicated that foveal load modulates the perceptual span during Chinese reading (Yan, Kliegl, Shu, Pan, & Zhou, 2010 ). Implications of these results for models of eye movement control are discussed.
ISSN:0922-4777
1573-0905
DOI:10.1007/s11145-010-9282-7