Is preview benefit from word n + 2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements
Although most studies of reading English (and other alphabetic languages) have indicated that readers do not obtain preview benefit from word n + 2, Yang, Wang, Xu, and Rayner ( 2009 ) reported evidence that Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2. However, this effect may not be comm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reading & writing 2012-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1079-1091 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Although most studies of reading English (and other alphabetic languages) have indicated that readers do not obtain preview benefit from word n + 2, Yang, Wang, Xu, and Rayner (
2009
) reported evidence that Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2. However, this effect may not be common in Chinese because the character prior to the target word in Yang et al.’s experiment was always a very high frequency function word. In the current experiment, we utilized a relatively low frequency word n + 1 to examine whether an n + 2 preview benefit effect would still exist and failed to find any preview benefit from word n + 2. These results are consistent with a recent study which indicated that foveal load modulates the perceptual span during Chinese reading (Yan, Kliegl, Shu, Pan, & Zhou,
2010
). Implications of these results for models of eye movement control are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0922-4777 1573-0905 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11145-010-9282-7 |