Genetic and Epigenetic Determinants of Neurogenesis and Myogenesis

The regulatory networks of differentiation programs have been partly characterized; however, the molecular mechanisms of lineage-specific gene regulation by highly similar transcription factors remain largely unknown. Here we compare the genome-wide binding and transcription profiles of NEUROD2-mediated neurogenesis with MYOD-mediated myogenesis. We demonstrate that NEUROD2 and MYOD bind a shared CAGCTG E box motif and E box motifs specific for each factor: CAGGTG for MYOD and CAGATG for NEUROD2. Binding at factor-specific motifs is associated with gene transcription, whereas binding at shared sites is associated with regional epigenetic modifications but is not as strongly associated with gene transcription. Binding is largely constrained to E boxes preset in an accessible chromatin context that determines the set of target genes activated in each cell type. These findings demonstrate that the differentiation program is genetically determined by E box sequence, whereas cell lineage epigenetically determines the availability of E boxes for each differentiation program. ► MYOD and NEUROD2 bind to shared and factor-specific E boxes ► Binding at factor-specific motifs is associated with gene transcription ► MYOD and NEUROD2 binding is constrained to E boxes in accessible chromatin ► Lineage determines accessibility of genetically determined differentiation programs The bHLH transcription factors NEUROD2 and MYOD bind similar DNA motifs yet control neurogenesis and myogenesis, respectively. Fong et al. compare DNA binding and gene regulation by these two factors. They find evidence for functional distinctions between shared and factor-specific DNA motifs and for cell-type-specific contextual control of binding-site availability.