Comparison of elliptical training, stationary cycling, treadmill walking and overground walking
The most common functional motor goal of lower extremity rehabilitation is to improve walking ability. For reasons of feasibility, safety or intensity, devices are frequently used to facilitate or augment gait training. The objective of this study was to compare the muscle activity patterns of the q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gait & posture 2011-01, Vol.33 (2), p.244-250 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The most common functional motor goal of lower extremity rehabilitation is to improve walking ability. For reasons of feasibility, safety or intensity, devices are frequently used to facilitate or augment gait training. The objective of this study was to compare the muscle activity patterns of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles during four conditions: overground walking, treadmill walking, stationary cycling, and elliptical training. Ten healthy adults (6 male, 4 female; mean age 22.7 ± 2.9 yrs, range 20–29) participated. Surface electromyographic data were recorded from the rectus femoris and semitendinosus. Linear envelope curves were generated and time normalized from 0–100% cycle. The mean plus three standard deviations from a static trial was used as the threshold for muscle activity. Repeated measures analysis of variance procedures were used to detect differences between conditions. Elliptical training demonstrated greater quadriceps activity and greater quadriceps/hamstrings coactivation than all other conditions. Consistent with previous work, treadmill walking demonstrated greater quadriceps activity than overground walking. Minimal differences in hamstring activation were observed between conditions, limited to lower peak activity during cycling compared to treadmill walking. These results provide normative values for quadriceps and hamstring activation for different locomotor training methods and may assist in selecting the most appropriate training device for specific patients. Clinicians and researchers should also consider the kinematic and kinetic differences between tasks, which cannot necessarily be inferred from muscle activation patterns. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0966-6362 1879-2219 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.013 |