Computer-aided quantitative bone scan assessment of prostate cancer treatment response

OBJECTIVEThe development and evaluation of a computer-aided bone scan analysis technique to quantify changes in tumor burden and assess treatment effects in prostate cancer clinical trials. METHODSWe have developed and report on a commercial fully automated computer-aided detection (CAD) system. Usi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear medicine communications 2012-04, Vol.33 (4), p.384-394
Hauptverfasser: Brown, Matthew S, Chu, Gregory H, Kim, Hyun J, Allen-Auerbach, Martin, Poon, Cheryce, Bridges, Juliette, Vidovic, Adria, Ramakrishna, Bharath, Ho, Judy, Morris, Michael J, Larson, Steven M, Scher, Howard I, Goldin, Jonathan G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVEThe development and evaluation of a computer-aided bone scan analysis technique to quantify changes in tumor burden and assess treatment effects in prostate cancer clinical trials. METHODSWe have developed and report on a commercial fully automated computer-aided detection (CAD) system. Using this system, scan images were intensity normalized, and then lesions were identified and segmented by anatomic region-specific intensity thresholding. Detected lesions were compared against expert markings to assess the accuracy of the CAD system. The metrics Bone Scan Lesion Area, Bone Scan Lesion Intensity, and Bone Scan Lesion Count were calculated from identified lesions, and their utility in assessing treatment effects was evaluated by analyzing before and after scans from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients10 treated and 10 untreated. In this study, patients were treated with cabozantinib, a MET/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor resulting in high rates of resolution of bone scan abnormalities. RESULTSOur automated CAD system identified bone lesion pixels with 94% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 89% accuracy. Significant differences in changes from baseline were found between treated and untreated groups in all assessed measurements derived by our system. The most significant measure, Bone Scan Lesion Area, showed a median (interquartile range) change from baseline at week 6 of 7.13% (27.61) in the untreated group compared with −73.76% (45.38) in the cabozantinib-treated group (P=0.0003). CONCLUSIONOur system accurately and objectively identified and quantified metastases in bone scans, allowing for interpatient and intrapatient comparison. It demonstrates potential as an objective measurement of treatment effects, laying the foundation for validation against other clinically relevant outcome measures.
ISSN:0143-3636
1473-5628
DOI:10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283503ebf