Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization
Purpose To verify whether a novel protocol administering E 2 during the luteal phase of the preceding cycle and during ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycle could enhance follicular response and hence improve outcomes in poor responders. Methods In this retrospective analysis, a total of 155...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2012-03, Vol.29 (3), p.225-230 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To verify whether a novel protocol administering E
2
during the luteal phase of the preceding cycle and during ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycle could enhance follicular response and hence improve outcomes in poor responders.
Methods
In this retrospective analysis, a total of 155 poor responder patients subjected to IVF/ICSI were analyzed. All the patients had history of more than one prior IVF cycle failure with poor response (less than 5 oocytes retrieved and/or maximal E
2
level less than 500 pg/mL) by using conventional long agonist or antagonist protocol. In luteal E2 treatment protocol (
n
= 86), oral estradiol valerate 4 mg/day was initiated on luteal day 21 and either stopped at menstrual cycle day 3 (Protocol A,
n
= 28) or continued during the period of ovarian stimulation until the day of hCG injection (Protocol B,
n
= 58). IVF parameters and pregnancy outcome of luteal E2 treatments group were compared with a standard GnRH antagonist protocol (
n
= 69) which the patients received no hormonal pretreatment.
Results
Compared to standard GnRH antagonist protocol, cancellation rate was lower with luteal E2 group (15.1% vs 37.7%,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1058-0468 1573-7330 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10815-011-9685-7 |