Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Probably Induced by Cefotaxime: a Report of Two Cases

We report two cases, one of a 52-year-old man and one of a 32-year-old man, who were treated with cefotaxime. On day 23 and day 28 of the treatment, respectively, the patients manifested clinically with fever, pruriginous skin rash, and facial edema. Blood tests showed marked eosinophilia and atypic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical medicine & research 2012-02, Vol.10 (1), p.32-35
Hauptverfasser: Aouam, Karim, Chaabane, Amel, Toumi, Adnen, Ben Fredj, Nadia, Ben Romdhane, Foued, Boughattas, Naceur A, Chakroun, Mohamed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We report two cases, one of a 52-year-old man and one of a 32-year-old man, who were treated with cefotaxime. On day 23 and day 28 of the treatment, respectively, the patients manifested clinically with fever, pruriginous skin rash, and facial edema. Blood tests showed marked eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis for both patients, and hepatic cytolysis only in the second patient. Cefotaxime was discontinued in both patients; the clinico-biological picture improved gradually and completely disappeared approximately 4 weeks later. Six weeks after complete recovery, both patients underwent intradermal testing which was positive to cefotaxime (2 mg/ml) at the 48-hour reading and negative to benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, and cefazolin at the 20-minute and 48-hour readings. These clinical pictures suggest drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) induced by cefotaxime. To the best of our knowledge, only one case of cefotaxime-induced DRESS has been reported in the medical literature. Thus, we add two new cases of cefotaxime-induced DRESS and emphasize the usefulness and safety of intradermal testing in establishing the diagnosis.
ISSN:1539-4182
1554-6179
DOI:10.3121/cmr.2011.995