Serum vitamin D levels among patients in a clinical oncology practice compared to primary care patients in the same community: a case–control study

ObjectivesLow serum vitamin D levels have been associated with risk for certain malignancies, but studies have not directly analysed levels between community oncology and primary care practices. The purpose of this study was to compare serum vitamin D levels in patients at a community oncology pract...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2011-01, Vol.1 (2), p.e000397-e000397
Hauptverfasser: Churilla, Thomas M, Lesko, Samuel L, Brereton, Harmar D, Klem, Mary, Donnelly, Patrick E, Peters, Christopher A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesLow serum vitamin D levels have been associated with risk for certain malignancies, but studies have not directly analysed levels between community oncology and primary care practices. The purpose of this study was to compare serum vitamin D levels in patients at a community oncology practice with non-cancer patients at a primary care practice.DesignRetrospective case–control study. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D levels were ordered for screening in both cancer and non-cancer patients. Levels were compared in univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, body mass index and season of blood draw.SettingA community-based radiation oncology centre and a community-based primary care practice: both located in Northeastern Pennsylvania, USA.Participants170 newly diagnosed cancer patients referred for initial consultation at the community oncology centre from 21 November 2008 to 18 May 2010, and 170 non-cancer patients of the primary care practice who underwent screening for hypovitaminosis D for the first time from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was mean serum vitamin D level, and the secondary outcome measures were frequencies of patients with vitamin D levels
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000397