Activating Peripheral Arterial Disease Patients to Reduce Cholesterol: A Randomized Trial

Abstract Background Peripheral arterial disease patients are less likely than other high-risk patients to achieve ideal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. This randomized controlled trial assessed whether a telephone counseling intervention, designed to help peripheral arterial diseas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of medicine 2011-06, Vol.124 (6), p.557-565
Hauptverfasser: McDermott, Mary M., MD, Reed, George, PhD, Greenland, Philip, MD, Mazor, Kathy M., EdD, Pagoto, Sherry, PhD, Ockene, Judith K., PhD, Graff, Rex, BA, Merriam, Philip A., MSPH, Leung, Kathy, MS, Manheim, Larry, PhD, Kibbe, Melina R., MD, Olendzki, Barbara, RD, Pearce, William H., MD, Ockene, Ira S., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Peripheral arterial disease patients are less likely than other high-risk patients to achieve ideal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. This randomized controlled trial assessed whether a telephone counseling intervention, designed to help peripheral arterial disease patients request more intensive cholesterol-lowering therapy from their physician, achieved lower LDL cholesterol levels than 2 control conditions. Methods There were 355 peripheral arterial disease participants with baseline LDL cholesterol ≥70 mg/dL enrolled. The primary outcome was change in LDL cholesterol level at 12-month follow-up. There were 3 parallel arms: telephone counseling intervention, attention control condition, and usual care. The intervention consisted of patient-centered counseling, delivered every 6 weeks, encouraging participants to request increases in cholesterol-lowering therapy from their physician. The attention control condition consisted of telephone calls every 6 weeks providing information only. The usual care condition participated in baseline and follow-up testing. Results At 12-month follow-up, participants in the intervention improved their LDL cholesterol level, compared with those in attention control (−18.4 mg/dL vs −6.8 mg/dL, P = .010) but not compared with those in usual care (−18.4 mg/dL vs −11.1 mg/dL, P = .208). Intervention participants were more likely to start a cholesterol-lowering medication or increase their cholesterol-lowering medication dose than those in the attention control (54% vs 18%, P = .001) and usual care (54% vs 31%, P
ISSN:0002-9343
1555-7162
DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.11.032