Timing of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders for Hospitalized Older Adults Who Require a Surrogate Decision-Maker
OBJECTIVES: To examine the frequency of surrogate decisions for in‐hospital do‐not‐resuscitate (DNR) orders and the timing of DNR order entry for surrogate decisions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large, urban, public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized adults aged 65 and older over...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2011-07, Vol.59 (7), p.1326-1331 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVES: To examine the frequency of surrogate decisions for in‐hospital do‐not‐resuscitate (DNR) orders and the timing of DNR order entry for surrogate decisions.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Large, urban, public hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized adults aged 65 and older over a 3‐year period (1/1/2004–12/31/2006) with a DNR order during their hospital stay.
MEASUREMENTS: Electronic chart review provided data on frequency of surrogate decisions, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, and timing of DNR orders.
RESULTS: Of 668 patients, the ordering physician indicated that the DNR decision was made with the patient in 191 cases (28.9%), the surrogate in 389 (58.2%), and both in 88 (13.2%). Patients who required a surrogate were more likely to be in the intensive care unit (62.2% vs 39.8%, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03480.x |