Molecular monitoring of resistant dhfr and dhps allelic haplotypes in Morogoro and Mvomero districts in south eastern Tanzania
Background: Resistance to the antimalarial drug sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) emerged in Plasmodium falciparum from Asia in the 1960s and subsequently spread to Africa. In Tanzania, SP use as a national policy began in 1983 as a second line to chloroquine (CQ) for the treatment of uncomplicated mal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | African health sciences 2011-06, Vol.11 (2), p.142-150 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Resistance to the antimalarial drug
sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) emerged in Plasmodium falciparum from
Asia in the 1960s and subsequently spread to Africa. In Tanzania, SP
use as a national policy began in 1983 as a second line to chloroquine
(CQ) for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria, until August 2001 when
it was approved to replace CQ as a national first line. Objective: The
present study assesses the frequency of resistant dhfr and dhps alleles
in Morogoro-Mvomero district in south eastern Tanzania and contrast
their rate of change during 17 years of SP second line use against five
years of SP first line use. Methodology: Cross sectional surveys of
asymptomatic infections were carried out at the end of rainy season
during July-September of 2000, when SP was the national second line (CQ
was the first line) and 2006 when SP was the national first line
antimalarial treatment. Genetic analysis of SP resistance genes was
carried out on 1,044 asymptomatic infections and the effect of the two
policies on SP evolution compared. Results: The frequency of the most
resistant allele, the double dhps-triple dhfr mutant genotype,
increased by only 1% during 17 years of SP second line use, but there
was a dramatic increase by 45% during five years of SP first line use.
Conclusion: We conclude that National policy change from second line to
first line SP, brought about an immediate shift in treatment practice
and this in turn had a highly significant impact on drug pressure. The
use of SP in specific programs only such as intermittent preventive
treatment of infants (IPTi) and intermittent preventive treatment of
pregnant women (IPTp) will most likely reduce substantially SP
selection pressure and the SP resistance alleles alike. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-6905 1729-0503 |