Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders and Predictors of Pain Management Program Success in Patients With Chronic Pain

BACKGROUND: This prospective investigation assessed success rates of a pain management program for patients with and without DSM-III-R Axis I and II psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Subjects included 40 consecutive patients with chronic pain who were referred to a physical therapy-oriented, "stan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Primary care companion for CNS disorders 2002-08, Vol.4 (4), p.137-140
Hauptverfasser: Workman, Edward A., Hubbard, John R., Felker, Bradford L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: This prospective investigation assessed success rates of a pain management program for patients with and without DSM-III-R Axis I and II psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Subjects included 40 consecutive patients with chronic pain who were referred to a physical therapy-oriented, "standard" pain management program. Serial ratings of pain levels were measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline, weekly throughout a 12-week program, and during a follow-up interval 1 month after completion of the program. Weekly reports of hours of gainful employment were recorded. VAS scores and number of hours worked per week were combined into a measure of pain improvement. This dependent variable was used to compare groups of patients across psychiatric disorders diagnosed via the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS). Percentages of patients in each diagnostic group who met minimal criteria for improvement were computed and compared. A chi-square analysis was conducted on success rates between patients with and without any Axis I disorder, any Axis II disorder, and any substance abuse/dependence disorder. RESULTS: Overall, 70% of patients (N = 28) were found to have a DIS psychiatric disorder. There were differences in improvement between patients with and without Axis I disorders and between those with and without Axis II disorders. The presence of a diagnosis was associated with significantly lower improvement rates (p
ISSN:1523-5998
2155-7780
2155-7780
DOI:10.4088/PCC.v04n0404