Likelihood of missed and recurrent adenomas in the proximal versus the distal colon

Background Colonoscopy may be less efficacious in reducing colorectal cancer mortality in the proximal compared with the distal colon. A greater likelihood for missed and recurrent adenomas in the proximal colon may contribute to this phenomenon. Objective To examine whether a proximal adenoma is as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2011-08, Vol.74 (2), p.253-261
Hauptverfasser: Laiyemo, Adeyinka O., MD, MPH, Doubeni, Chyke, MD, MPH, Sanderson, Andrew K., MD, Pinsky, Paul F., PhD, Badurdeen, Dilhana S., MD, Doria-Rose, V. Paul, DVM, PhD, Marcus, Pamela M., PhD, Schoen, Robert E., MD, MPH, Lanza, Elaine, PhD, Schatzkin, Arthur, MD, DrPH, Cross, Amanda J., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Colonoscopy may be less efficacious in reducing colorectal cancer mortality in the proximal compared with the distal colon. A greater likelihood for missed and recurrent adenomas in the proximal colon may contribute to this phenomenon. Objective To examine whether a proximal adenoma is associated with the risk and location of missed and recurrent adenomas. Design Prospective. Setting Polyp Prevention Trial. Participants A total of 1864 patients with an adenoma at baseline underwent a follow-up colonoscopy 4 years later (adenoma recurrence). Of these, 1731 underwent a clearing colonoscopy 1 year after the baseline examination (missed adenoma). Main Outcome Measurements Association of baseline adenoma location with the risk and location of adenomas found at colonoscopy performed 1 year and 4 years later. Results At the year 1 colonoscopy, 598 patients (34.6%) had an adenoma (missed adenoma). Compared with those with a distal-only adenoma at baseline, patients with a proximal-only adenoma at baseline were more likely to have any missed adenomas (relative risk [RR] 1.28; 95% CI, 1.09-1.49) and a proximal-only missed adenoma (RR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.49-2.80). At the year 4 colonoscopy, 733 patients (39.3%) had adenoma recurrence. Patients with a baseline proximal-only adenoma were more likely to have any adenoma recurrence (RR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31) and a proximal-only adenoma recurrence (RR 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15-2.02). Sensitivity analyses involving missed adenomas did not materially affect the risk or location of recurrent adenomas at year 4 colonoscopy. Limitation Lesions may still be missed on repeated colonoscopies. Conclusions Missed and recurrent adenomas are more likely to be in the proximal colon.
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.023