Evaluation of a Newly Developed Lateral Flow Immunoassay for the Diagnosis of Cryptococcosis

Background. Cryptococcosis is a common opportunistic infection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)—infected individuals mostly occurring in resource-limited countries. This study compares the performance of a recently developed lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) to blood culture and enzyme immunoassay...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2011-08, Vol.53 (4), p.321-325
Hauptverfasser: Lindsley, Mark D., Mekha, Nanthawan, Baggett, Henry C., Surinthong, Yupha, Autthateinchai, Rinrapas, Sawatwong, Pongpun, Harris, Julie R., Park, Benjamin J., Chiller, Tom, Balajee, S. Arunmozhi, Poonwan, Natteewan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. Cryptococcosis is a common opportunistic infection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)—infected individuals mostly occurring in resource-limited countries. This study compares the performance of a recently developed lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) to blood culture and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the diagnosis of cryptococcosis. Methods. Archived sera from 704 HIV-infected patients hospitalized for acute respiratory illness in Thailand were tested for cryptococcal antigenemia using EIA. All EIA-positive and a subset of EIA-negative sera were tested by LFA, with results recorded after 5 and 15 minutes incubation. Urine from patients with LFA- and EIA-positive sera was tested by LFA. Antigen results from patients with positive cryptococcal blood cultures were compared. Results. Of 704 sera, 92 (13%) were positive by EIA; among the 91 EIA-positive sera tested by LFA, 82 (90%) and 87 (96%) were LFA positive when read after 5 and 15 minutes, respectively. Kappa agreement of EIA and LFA for sera was 0.923 after 5 minutes and 0.959 after 15 minutes, respectively. Two of 373 EIA-negative sera were LFA positive at both time points. Of 74 urine specimens from EIA-positive patients, 52 (70.3%) were LFA positive. EIA was positive in 16 of 17 sera from blood culture—positive patients (94% sensitivity), and all sera were positive by LFA (100% sensitivity). Conclusions. A high level of agreement was shown between LFA and EIA testing of serum. The LFA is a rapid, easy-to-perform assay that does not require refrigeration, demonstrating its potential usefulness as a point-of-care assay for diagnosis of cryptococcosis in resource-limited countries.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/cir379