Clinicians' guide to statistics for medical practice and research: part I

There are many reasons for inconsistencies (good day, bad day, etc.), but they all boil down to variance. Because in clinical research we rely on a sample of the patient population, variance is a key consideration in the evaluation of observed differences. [...]if this observation were repeated 100...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Ochsner journal 2006-12, Vol.6 (2), p.68-83
Hauptverfasser: Krousel-Wood, Marie A, Chambers, Richard B, Muntner, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There are many reasons for inconsistencies (good day, bad day, etc.), but they all boil down to variance. Because in clinical research we rely on a sample of the patient population, variance is a key consideration in the evaluation of observed differences. [...]if this observation were repeated 100 times in similar populations of the same sample size, 95 of the sampled death rates would fall between .011 and .440. [...]in populations where disease prevalence is high, there will be greater confidence that a positive test result is a true positive, and increased suspicion that a negative test result is a false negative. Diagram of Observed Frequencies Extracted for Odds Ratio Example The relative risk or risk ratio (RR) is calculated from a cohort study where exposed and non-exposed participants are followed over time and the incidence of disease is observed. Because the hallmark of a cohort study is following a population over time to identify incident cases of disease, the cohort is screened to assure that no participant enrolled in the study has already experienced the outcome or disease event.
ISSN:1524-5012