Development and Validation of a Cervical Cancer Screening Self-Efficacy Scale for Low-Income Mexican American Women

Although self-efficacy, a construct from social cognitive theory, has been shown to influence other screening behaviors, few measures currently exist for measuring Papanicolaou test self-efficacy. This article describes the development and psychometric testing of such a measure for Mexican American...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention biomarkers & prevention, 2009-03, Vol.18 (3), p.866-875
Hauptverfasser: FERNANDEZ, Maria E, DIAMOND, Pamela M, RAKOWSKI, William, GONZALES, Alicia, TORTOLERO-LUNA, Guillermo, WILLIAMS, Janet, MORALES-CAMPOS, Daisy Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although self-efficacy, a construct from social cognitive theory, has been shown to influence other screening behaviors, few measures currently exist for measuring Papanicolaou test self-efficacy. This article describes the development and psychometric testing of such a measure for Mexican American women. Data from two separate samples of Mexican American women ages ≥50 years, obtained as part of a study to develop and evaluate a breast and cervical cancer screening educational program, were used in the current study. Exploratory factor analysis indicated a single-factor solution and all item loadings were >0.73. Confirmatory analysis confirmed a single-factor structure with all standardized loadings >0.40 as hypothesized. The eight-item self-efficacy scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95). As hypothesized, self-efficacy was correlated with knowledge, prior experience, and screening intention. Logistic regression supported the theoretical relationship that women with higher self-efficacy were more likely to have had a recent Papanicolaou test. Findings showed a significant increase in self-efficacy following the intervention, indicating that the measure has good sensitivity to change over time. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(3):866–75)
ISSN:1055-9965
1538-7755
DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2950