Quantitative Mitral Valve Modeling Using Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Technique and Repeatability

Background Real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has the ability to construct quantitative models of the mitral valve (MV). Imaging and modeling algorithms rely on operator interpretation of raw images and may be subject to observer-dependent variability. We describe a comprehensive anal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of thoracic surgery 2011, Vol.91 (1), p.165-171
Hauptverfasser: Jassar, Arminder Singh, MBBS, Brinster, Clayton J., MD, Vergnat, Mathieu, MD, Robb, J. Daniel, MBBS, Eperjesi, Thomas J., BS, Pouch, Alison M., BS, Cheung, Albert T., MD, Weiss, Stuart J., MD, PhD, Acker, Michael A., MD, Gorman, Joseph H., MD, Gorman, Robert C., MD, Jackson, Benjamin M., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has the ability to construct quantitative models of the mitral valve (MV). Imaging and modeling algorithms rely on operator interpretation of raw images and may be subject to observer-dependent variability. We describe a comprehensive analysis technique to generate high-resolution 3D MV models and examine interoperator and intraoperator repeatability in humans. Methods Patients with normal MVs were imaged using intraoperative transesophageal real-time 3D echocardiography. The annulus and leaflets were manually segmented using a TomTec Echo-View workstation. The resultant annular and leaflet point cloud was used to generate fully quantitative 3D MV models using custom Matlab algorithms. Eight images were subjected to analysis by two independent observers. Two sequential images were acquired for 6 patients and analyzed by the same observer. Each pair of annular tracings was compared with respect to conventional variables and by calculating the mean absolute distance between paired renderings. To compare leaflets, MV models were aligned so as to minimize their sum of squares difference, and their mean absolute difference was measured. Results Mean absolute annular and leaflet distance was 2.4 ± 0.8 and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm for the interobserver and 1.5 ± 0.6 and 0.5 ± 0.2 mm for the intraobserver comparisons, respectively. There was less than 10% variation in annular variables between comparisons. Conclusions These techniques generate high-resolution, quantitative 3D models of the MV and can be used consistently to image the human MV with very small interoperator and intraoperator variability. These data lay the framework for reliable and comprehensive noninvasive modeling of the normal and diseased MV.
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.10.034