Improving textual medication extraction using combined conditional random fields and rule-based systems

In the i2b2 Medication Extraction Challenge, medication names together with details of their administration were to be extracted from medical discharge summaries. The task of the challenge was decomposed into three pipelined components: named entity identification, context-aware filtering and relati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 2010-09, Vol.17 (5), p.540-544
Hauptverfasser: Tikk, Domonkos, Solt, Illés
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the i2b2 Medication Extraction Challenge, medication names together with details of their administration were to be extracted from medical discharge summaries. The task of the challenge was decomposed into three pipelined components: named entity identification, context-aware filtering and relation extraction. For named entity identification, first a rule-based (RB) method that was used in our overall fifth place-ranked solution at the challenge was investigated. Second, a conditional random fields (CRF) approach is presented for named entity identification (NEI) developed after the completion of the challenge. The CRF models are trained on the 17 ground truth documents, the output of the rule-based NEI component on all documents, a larger but potentially inaccurate training dataset. For both NEI approaches their effect on relation extraction performance was investigated. The filtering and relation extraction components are both rule-based. In addition to the official entry level evaluation of the challenge, entity level analysis is also provided. On the test data an entry level F(1)-score of 80% was achieved for exact matching and 81% for inexact matching with the RB-NEI component. The CRF produces a significantly weaker result, but CRF outperforms the rule-based model with 81% exact and 82% inexact F(1)-score (p
ISSN:1067-5027
1527-974X
DOI:10.1136/jamia.2010.004119